Wednesday, April 4, 2018

Teacher Leadership: Standard 7


Standard 7: Utilize Instructional Frameworks for Teaching to Improve Practice


With taking courses in administration through this program, initially it was slightly intimidating and pushed me to change my mindset from teacher in the classroom to more principal, whole staff, and surrounding community. I think the biggest big idea that I walked away with was the difference between parent involvement and parent engagement. The courses o Engaging Communities and Teacher Leadership led in many conversations talking about this difference, and how to better parent engagement within our buildings. With reflecting it had me realize and almost analyze the leadership I have seen at my school and what they have not.

With completing the VLA assignment and conducting my principal interview, it allowed me to dig deeper into the inner workings of Horizon and where our vision came from and think about where it could go now that we are under new administration leadership. I remember discussing and deciding on this vision/mission statement 4 years ago in a staff meeting. I remember very vividly that our principal at the time wanted a mission statement that the staff would be able to remember quickly and be able to verbalize if asked on the spot. I am going to be honest though, I had to look up my school's “vision” statement on our school’s SharePoint page to truly answer this question. However, I believe that now that my school is under new leadership, it will be tweaked to some extent. According to our school’s SharePoint page, our school's vision is to do the following: “We continuously improve and function collaboratively to increase all students' success by:  1) Honoring academic background, life experiences, culture, and language of all students through aligned curriculum and best practices. 2) Building positive relationships in a safe, consistent school environment that ensures all students reach their full potential and 3) utilize standards-based assessments and effective teaching strategies to maximize student growth.

With talking with our new principal, he explained how our vision as a school stems from our district’s overall vision of “Our mission is to help prepare our community's children to be successful, contributing members of the community. Our students learn in an environment that is positive, caring, and focused on their highest academic potential” (Mukilteo School District homepage). The two visions are aligned with wanting to give students a place to feel safe in their learning. Believing that if the students feel safe at school and have those positive relationships, they will be able to dig deep and focus on their academics-which will mold them into knowledgeable members of society.  

One of my favorite articles that we read and discussed in Engage Communities course was the Healthy and Proactive Approach article. One of the ideas that I really liked from the reading was to "survey the customers" I thought that this was a great way for principals and schools to really COMMUNICATE with parents and receive immediate feedback. I feel that the area of communication was an area of struggle for my school and our community. There is a major language barrier, but there are ways to try to bridge that gap. And the first step in that is making every parent feel comfortable with being on campus. Another thing that I took note of was the management walking around section. Where the principal actually meets and talks to parents. Not avoid them at all costs. My previous principal used to hide in her office and avoid parents and sometimes staff at all cost. She would not interact with staff and had seemed to have made students and parent interaction even lower on the totem pole for her. In seeing reading discussing with classmates the power of getting parents not only involved in school but ENGAGED with decision making, and the effects that has on kids, is amazing. If I ever decide to become an administrator down the road, one of my biggest goals is to communicate and connect with parents on a regular basis. In order to do that, I would have to invite the parents IN. Not push them away and make them feel unwelcomed. I am seeing this year with our new principal he is almost the complete opposite. Rarely ever in his office. Always wandering the halls, playground, lunchroom, and in and out of classrooms. He is PRESENT and interacts with our parents. Experiencing these two leadership types, has definitely allowed me to see what is beneficial for our buildings culture and climate, and what is not.  

The second big idea that I took from the Engaging Communities course, was doing the Community Engagement Plan. I think going through that process allowed me to see the strengths that my school has in this area and also the areas that we fall short in. Doing the research about our school’s demographic was definitely eye opening compared to other schools. Knowing that our demographic plays a huge role when it comes to teaching practices and standardized testing, needing to reach more than half of the population with English language support. Knowing those numbers, as an administrator it would cause me to think about the services and practices we are providing and what new ideas can we implement. I believe that my previous principal started to take the steps towards this, but needs more support and staff buy in to make it successful. Reading the articles about the benefits of trying to implement dual language programs in schools, both of the articles were very interesting to read and allowed me to see that my principal was on to something with the idea of implementing Co-Teach, but just needs more support and resources.

In the first article it talks about how principals really struggle with the implementation of it, due to the lack of preparation programs or school districts that actually provide the pre-and in-service trainings. In article one, it states that “Each principal was critical of existing structures that segregated students, adopted new structures and staff responsibilities to promote inclusion, engaged community building and professional development to change teacher expectations and build pedagogical competencies to provide high quality instruction in two languages, and created systems of communication with families whose home language was not English” (7). In reading these articles, it allowed me to reflect on what my previous principal tried to do in order to bridge the gap with our high population of ELL students. Over half are Hispanic, so reading how dual language programs work, this could be a very beneficial thing for a school like Horizon. As school, we just currently struggle with getting the staff to buy in to the idea, and with new leadership, his understanding of this program that was developed before he arrived is hard for him to grasp and work with to support.

In class (engaging communities) we talked about how it takes 3-5 years for a new “program” to take shape. With experiencing and being a part of the ELL/SPED co-teach pilot, I see how important it is to see these ideas through. The first year we had ALL teachers-4thgrade team and the support staff on board and trying to make this concept work for our students. Which resulted in amazing growth and improvement in test scores. However, being a part of the team this year with new people, it has not shown to be effective, as the new staff did not support or buy into it as much. I think overall with this idea, I have seen the importance of how key the role of administration and their leadership is with these types of ideas and change. It is extremely important for leadership to be there to support their staff and “get down in the trenches” with them with this type of work. You cannot expect to lead your staff and not be “with them.” I think that is another huge concept that I have not fully experienced as a teacher from my leader, but know it is important when the time comes to lead.

In the end, these courses opened my eyes to the balancing act principals have to take on when it comes down to it. Principals need to be strong in knowledge, people skills, and have the strength and willingness to try and try again when it comes to the success of their building. Knowing the importance of communication, using resources that are provided within the building and in the community is also a huge factor. And lastly, seeing your school’s need and proactively seeking a way to solve and provide the best for students and staff is also extremely important. That as a leader, you must make yourself known and a part of the team. Not close yourself behind office doors and hide behind a desk. That being seen and building relationships with students, parents and staff is key for a healthy school. It is not easy to please everyone but showing that you are willing to listen and work together to create the best learning environment for the kids is what is really comes down to. With taking these administration classes, I am not sure if being a principal is part of my path yet, but my eyes are definitely opened, and my thinking has broadened a lot more as an educator. I now think about not just about making a difference in my own classroom but, what more can I do about the building I work in and the community that surrounds it.

References:


Community–School Partnerships. (n.d.). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Out-of-School Learning.

Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (n.d.). Moving Forward: Ideas for Research on School, Family, and Community Partnerships. The SAGE Handbook for Research in Education,116-137. 


McEwan-Adkins, E. K. (2005). How to deal with parents who are angry, troubled, afraid, or just plain crazy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Owens, R. G., & Valesky, T. C. (2015). Organizational behavior in education: Leadership and school reform. Harlow, Essex: Pearson.

Utt, J. (2015). 10 Ways Well-Meaning White Teachers Bring Racism Into Our Schools. Retrieved from https://canvas.spu.edu/courses/15508/files/folder/Assigned Readings/Building Support and Avoiding Racism?preview=544197.

Artifacts:



No comments:

Post a Comment